If you don't follow me on instagram, I am posting here as well about a major rebranding my channel will be undergoing. I still have a lot of love for Anglicanism but I am not sure that interdenominational content has been the best use of my channel for a variety of reasons.
/Young Anglican/ affiliated social media will be changed to Sub Umbra. Going forward I am going to focus on general Christian apologetics, culture, and history. My Anglican stuff will still stay up but I will not be making anymore content geared towards promoting Anglicanism specifically. If that kind of content is the reason you support the channel I understand if you withdraw your support.
However! In the new phase of the channel I will be launching a discord for supporters and trying to focus more on supporter exclusive content. So if you are excited by that idea definitely stay tuned.
Unfortunately my personal computer is still being repaired so no new videos for at least a week. But once I get my computer back you can excpect loads of new content I have been preparing and writing scripts for in the meantime.
Expect more edited videos dissecting literature, history and other pop culture from a Christian perspective.
I came from a Reformed back ground and I was discussing with my Presbyterian friend about how the Reformed view the patristics compared to Anglicans and here is what I wrote. Has anyone else had a similar experience?
"Quite honestly though the Reformed seem to be on the back foot in terms of patristic theology. You guys never present your theology positively from the patristics but only negatively. Pointing out nuance in the sources but you'll never hear from a Reformed theologian "Here is where Augustine agrees with us on baptism " or "Here is where Athanasius agrees with us on church polity" or "Here is where Ambrose agrees with us on the meaningof apostacy". All these issues were debated but none of the positive answers given fit with the Reformed distinctives on these issues. So instead you get here is what Augustine, Athanasius, Ambrose, etc did not believe about these things but not much authority is granted to what they said about most topics."